[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: draft+thoughts
From:       Michael Reiher <michael.reiher () gmx ! de>
Date:       1999-03-01 22:55:03
[Download RAW message or body]

Simon Hausmann wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, David Faure wrote:
> [...]
> >> BTW, question in regard to the naming: Should we stay with kfmfinder or should
> >> we go for TreeView (or KfmTreeView) ?
> >Let's rename.
> >
> >> (my vote: I like TreeView (withouth the leading "Kfm") , because
> >>  a) "TreeView" is imho more self-explaining than "Finder" (wdh is a
> >> "Finder"? ;)
> >"Finder" is the Apple naming for it.
> 
> Ah, yes, now I remember. Thanks for the hint.
> :-)
I always wondered why itīs called finder. Now I know:)

> 
> >>  b) (in regard to the "Kfm") the TreeView might perhaps become more than a
> >> plain view-directories-and-files thing but, in regard to Michael Reiher's
> >> ideas, a completely configurable thing :-) (*really_looking_forward_to_this*)
> >So ? For me, "kfm" means file management, i.e. anything including file and
> >directory icons.
> >A Tree view always involve directory icons, even on a ftp site or seeing
> >files like mailboxes. I would keep the kfm, but that's just me and not very
> >important.
> 
> Ok, you convinced me.
> 
> KfmFinder -> KfmTreeView
> IconView -> KfmIconView as well, ok?
> HTMLView stays as is IMHO
> PartView ... well ;)
I think thatīs a good solution.

Ok guys, back and done my exams I will take a closer look into konqueror
now and try to do something useful:) I guess I should first dig through
the kom tutorials.

CU

Michael

-- 
Michael Reiher  
     Student at Dresden University of Technology
          Department of Computer Science
               email: michael.reiher@gmx.de

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]