On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 01:17:50PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Torben Weis wrote:
> 
> > DONT do that. You may get HTML via FTP, too. So it is actually the better
> > idea IMHO to decide about the kind of view after you looked at the
> > mime-type.
> 
> What about extending khtml to have a few kfm specific tags so one could do
> directory listings in html?  This would _really_ rock for implementing
> other protocols without tweaking kfm each time.
That's what kfm did, wasn't it ?
(are you talking about normal directory listing or .kde.html ?)
(it used HTML for both anyway)

konqueror is much faster for directory listing, because not using html anymore...

-- 
 ____________________________________________________________________
|                                                                    |
|  David FAURE                                                       |
|  E-mail : David.Faure@insa-lyon.fr, faure@kde.org                  |
|  http://www.insa-lyon.fr/People/AEDI/dfaure/index.html             |
|____________________________________________________________________|