[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: konqueror issues
From:       rupert THURNER <rthurner () edu ! uni-klu ! ac ! at>
Date:       1999-02-13 16:32:27
[Download RAW message or body]

if the first one is easier to implement, what are the advantages of the
other two?

rupert.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Should be do it like this:
KfmGui is the embeddable part of Konqueror, which itself supports the
three
kfm view types (html-mode, icon-mode, finder-mode) as QWidgets and
additionally
perhaps a fourth part-mode to embedd "foreign" parts as Kfm-View in
KfmGui (as
begin a part itself) ?

Or perhaps like this:
KfmGui remains the embeddable part of Konqueror, which itself supports
only
embedding parts. "Core" parts supported by konqueror are a html-part, an
icon-part and a finger-part . In addition with the possibility to embedd
"foreign" parts as well.

Or:
Remove KfmGui and make three independend kfm-parts: the html-part, the
icon-part and the finder-part. KfmMainWindow then could "host" these
three part
types (plus "foreign" parts as well, of course) .

(I like the first way, 'cause it's the easiest one to implement-> not so
much
work ;-)))

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]