--Boundary-00=_bjAdGyNC1qgL+9w
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 14 June 2007, Richard L=E4rk=E4ng wrote:
> After looking into it a bit more, it looks like my patch isn't enough. It
> seems additional headers could follow the "100 Continue"-line and then
> followed by an empty line, and a new status line.
>
> But the empty line is discarded by kio_http, so it's a bit hard to find t=
he
> next status line. Is that information needed anywhere, or could everything
> up to the next status line be discarded by kio_http?

So, basically what I mean is if the attached patch would be ok for kio_http=
?=20
(instead of the first patch I posted) At least, QHttp does the same thing.

/Richard

--Boundary-00=_bjAdGyNC1qgL+9w
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
  charset="iso-8859-1";
  name="http-continue.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="http-continue.patch"

Index: http.cc
===================================================================
--- http.cc	(revision 587848)
+++ http.cc	(arbetskopia)
@@ -3534,6 +3534,7 @@ try_again:
   // We need to reread the header if we got a '100 Continue' or '102 Processing'
   if ( cont )
   {
+    m_responseHeader.clear();
     goto try_again;
   }
 

--Boundary-00=_bjAdGyNC1qgL+9w--