[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: kdom and khtml integration
From:       Nikolas Zimmermann <zimmermann () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-03-01 15:21:38
Message-ID: 200603011621.39345.zimmermann () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 01 March 2006 14:31, Frans Englich wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:21, Rob Buis wrote:
> > Good evening khtml hackers :-)
>
> Came to think of another thing:
>
> I don't think KDOM as it is now is suitable for kdelibs inclusion. css/,
> core/ and events/ quite thoroughly spews compiler warnings and that isn't
> very correct. It is also avoided in kdelibs, so it would lower kdelibs
> quality.
>
> Likewise, there are admirable efforts for improving the Doxygen in kdelibs.
> KDOMBinder does currently at best generate no doxygen but regularly outputs
> invalid. I think it should be fixed, since otherwise it would lower kdelibs
> quality.
>
> But that's just my personal view on how things should be, of course.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> 		Frans

Hi Frans,

you may have misunderstood something. There won't be a KDOM
in kdelibs at all - we will integrate within khtml. That means we won't
port all-in-one-shot, but in little manageable pieces. That includes
regression testing, regression testing, regression testing. I for
sure wouldn't want to introduce new warnings/errors/bugs.

I'm not seeing your point. I want constructive discussions,
mails like these don't help at all. And yes, I'm a bit angry.

Bye
 Bye
  Niko
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]