From kfm-devel Wed Jan 11 02:24:52 2006 From: George Staikos Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:24:52 +0000 To: kfm-devel Subject: Re: KHTML, KJS Unfrozen -- details Message-Id: <200601102124.52641.staikos () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kfm-devel&m=113694635027954 On Tuesday 10 January 2006 21:21, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 23:27, Koos Vriezen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:24:22PM -0500, George Staikos wrote: > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 17:18, Koos Vriezen wrote: > > > > I'm convinced, where can I order two copies :) > > > > > > > > Seriously, since I've added KJS CPU guard, what will be the > > > > replacement? > > > > > > I don't know yet. > > > > Any idea how Safari solves this? (I hope we all agree that a script > > never may hang konqueror) > > I think they don't. Would it be hard to port the functionality? even if a > lot of syntax has changed, is that much of basics changed? Right, it should certainly be possible to add it in again. That's why I'm not worried. -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/