From kfm-devel Wed Jan 11 00:01:01 2006 From: Richard Moore Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:01:01 +0000 To: kfm-devel Subject: Re: KHTML, KJS Unfrozen -- details Message-Id: <5491a5150601101601i21ea7d10n336b2ef7ea6078d8 () mail ! gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kfm-devel&m=113693773318208 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------=_Part_9359_7797972.1136937661740" ------=_Part_9359_7797972.1136937661740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 1/10/06, Charles Samuels wrote: > > I think it'd be nice if Javascripts executed incrementally (like on a > QTimer(0) ). I don't really see how that could be acheived unfortunately. It would require an interpreter that made no use of the stack (which would be nice for other reasons), but would also have a massive performance overhead that would render sites that use js heavily unusable. Integrating a design like this into applications that use JS outside web pages would be tricky too. Rich. ------=_Part_9359_7797972.1136937661740 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

On 1/10/06, = Charles Samuels <charles@kde.org<= /a>> wrote:
I think it'd be nice if Javascri= pts executed incrementally (like on a
QTimer(0) ).
 
I don't really see how that could be acheived unfortunately. It would = require an interpreter that made no use of the stack (which would be nice f= or other reasons), but would also have a massive performance overhead = that would render sites that use js heavily unusable. Integrating a design = like this into applications that use JS outside web pages would be tricky t= oo.
 
Rich.
 

 

------=_Part_9359_7797972.1136937661740--