From kfm-devel  Thu Dec 02 11:30:15 2004
From: Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:30:15 +0000
To: kfm-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] konqueror keyboard link navigation
Message-Id: <200412021230.21331.l.savernik () aon ! at>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kfm-devel&m=110198672932654
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart7065386.7QpK2HQOEX"

--nextPart7065386.7QpK2HQOEX
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 12:08 schrieb Robert Ewald:
> To give an example: 25 access keys are defined: 'a-y' then we
> could use 'za' for the first link with no access key, 'zb' for the second
> and so on. If 'z' would have been also defined as an access key by the
> webpage, no space would be left for links without access keys.
>
[...]
>  We could choose to ignore the accesskey definition in the webpage
> altogether. Thats a quick and dirty sollution to the problem, but I am not
> sure if it is a good idea.

No, please refrain from this.

Better use the approach you described above. If there are no more free keys=
 --=20
bad luck.

mfg
 Leo

--nextPart7065386.7QpK2HQOEX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBrvzNj5jssenUYTsRAv4EAJ44WeZ9T4BChVYtu3TPMv+6ojj7awCghs8e
ETA+hBmL/STXL7tgMjju2fY=
=W7O5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart7065386.7QpK2HQOEX--