[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: KEditBookmarks crash
From:       Ladislav Strojil <Ladislav.Strojil () seznam ! cz>
Date:       2002-03-21 10:02:40
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 21 March 2002 10:39, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Ladislav Strojil wrote:
> > This is second issue with gcc-3.0.1 I encounter this day. What is the
> > official policy of KDE? Is gcc3 still not "allowed"?
>
> We don't forbid users to compile KDE with certain compilers ;-)

I know, some compilers forbid themselves. 
The problem is that experimenting which compiler gives the best results is 
very time consuming. Recompiling whole of QT/KDE and then testing it for few 
days/weeks before some hidden screw-ups show.

> > Is 3.0.4 better than 3.0.1?

Hmmm, so instead of 2.95 downgrade I can as well try upgrade to 3.0.4. How can 
one easily decide on Celeron@500? This is a decision for a lifetime (or so it 
seems when compiling QT).

Cheers,
Lada

- -- 
    ~       Ladislav Strojil, MFF UK
  ' v '               
 //   \\              
/(     )\    Powered by Penguin.
  ^ ' ^
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8ma/ATnMZPFqq4nwRAq8DAKC+MTA0q2roACJy9WfCJcnbdm1GLQCg1Bzs
fhH478f8ak4V8ppUzahKm1k=
=3+js
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]