[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: time for bugreports ?
From:       JES <yez () home ! nl>
Date:       2001-11-27 18:56:50
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 27 November 2001 15:46, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2001 09:30, JES wrote:
> |   Hi,
> |   Is it already time for reporting bugs for KDE3 ? I see that once in a
> | while people are sending links to the ML.. I have a list of sites that
> | don't work. Should I commit reports to bugs.kde.org or post them here ?
> |
> |   Edwin.
>
> Hi Edwin!
>
> I believe you should send "one bug report per site" to bugs.kde.org.
Yes, I know. I asked this because KDE3 is still in development, and I can 
imagine that we don't want to flood the bugreport database with bugs of a 
version that's in development.
> The best thing which you can do is to provide one testcase to each site
> (which demonstrates broken behavior).
How do you mean testcase ? A stripped version of the page ?
> Tescase should be really small - say, 1k (1000 bytes) in size.
In the past I did a quite some work to bring some problems to the essence, 
mailed it to the bugreport, but uptill now they're still there. I'm too 
unfamiliar with the code to fix it myself.
Maybe  I should mail them to this ML ?
>
> NOTE that there are some "questionable" cases - wether Konqueror renders
> some example *right* or *wrong*. The fact that Mozilla (or MS IE) renders
> some HTML in one way, and Konq - in another way, doesn't say a lot.
http://www.kscasino.com/247.asp :-)
> IMO we should try to fix standards-compliance code first (CSS, DOM, XML,
> HTML4) while of course top priority is crash-cases (hope we don't have a
> lot of them nowdays).
At least one : http://www.interselect.net/linux/softwaremainbody.html :-(
>
> BR,
Edwin.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]