[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kexec
Subject:    [PATCH v2 12/12] s390/mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
From:       Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky () amd ! com>
Date:       2021-08-13 16:59:31
Message-ID: 15e98b235f285fcf742cc3bb199998024b1ebba9.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky () amd ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(),
so remove the implementation. Since the default implementation of the
prot_guest_has() matches the s390 implementation of mem_encrypt_active(),
prot_guest_has() does not need to be implemented in s390 (the config
option ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST is not set).

Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 2542cbf7e2d1..08a8b96606d7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
-static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
-
 int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
 int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
 
-- 
2.32.0


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]