[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kernel-janitors
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] cxl: Fix error handling
From:       Michael Ellerman <mpe () ellerman ! id ! au>
Date:       2016-10-31 9:50:12
Message-ID: 87vaw826gb.fsf () concordia ! ellerman ! id ! au
[Download RAW message or body]

Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> On 31/10/16 08:34, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> 'cxl_dev_context_init()' returns an error pointer in case of error, not
>> NULL. So test it with IS_ERR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
>
>> ---
>> un-compiled because I don't have the required  cross build environment.
>
> Builds fine here.
>
> In future, you might want to bundle all 3 of your patches either into 1 
> patch (while they are changes which can be done separately, it's all 
> fixes to one type of problem in relation to one function, so personally 
> I'm okay with that) or send it as a series, so that it's clear to 
> everyone that they're all related fixes.

> Additionally, having the same patch subject line for two patches sent in 
> short succession is a bit confusing - in future, try and avoid that.

Yeah. I actually assumed it was two versions of the same patch.

cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic