[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kernel-hardening
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns
From:       ebiederm () xmission ! com (Eric W !  Biederman)
Date:       2021-08-24 3:24:17
Message-ID: 87lf4rplsu.fsf () disp2133
[Download RAW message or body]

"Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@intel.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> ...
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com
> Sorry, but <> around email address is needed 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

The change is already tested and pushed out so I really don't want to
mess with it.  Especially as I am aiming to send it to Linus on
Wednesday after it has had a chance to pass through linux-next and
whatever automated tests are there.

What does copying and pasting the Reported-by: tag as included in
your original report cause to break?

At this point I suspect that the danger of fat fingering something
far outweighs whatever benefits might be gained by surrounding the
email address with <> marks.

Eric
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]