[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: A final word and what to do now (was: A final word (was:Re: What's up and what's hot))
From:       Joseph Wenninger <jowenn () bigfoot ! com>
Date:       2001-08-10 20:36:30
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi

Sorry, if I disturb your discussions. 

> 
> I know that that would be a problem but the thing is that the overall speed
> of kde depends quite a lot on the size of kdeui. And the users are
> complaining about the speed and the hacks like kdeinit and the objprelink
> patch don't do all the trick. With the additional stuff in Qt3, even that
> library tends a bit to the bloatware direction :) That is why duplicated
> parts should IMHO be removed from the KDE API and we should stick to the Qt
> ones. I know that it would be a problem though, nonetheless.
> 


I wrote a mail a few days ago at kde core devel, which had something todo 
with the kdockwidgets, because they are NOT ONLY used in kdevelop. I think we 
shouldn't start removing classes completely without a really good 
replacement. I think the QDockWidgets are not really a good replacement. I 
thought we would at least stay in KDE 3.0 nearly source compatible.

********************************************
Now the important thing:

Why not split KDEUI into two or more smaller libs ? :Into common, often used 
widgets and into a lib with gui stuff, which is not that often (but at least 
is) used. The second/third/... lib only needs to be loaded if an application 
really needs those widgets/classes/.....

Kind regards
Joseph Wenninger

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request@kdevelop.org \
with the following body: unsubscribe »your-email-address«


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]