From kdevelop-devel Tue Aug 07 22:20:43 2001 From: Roland Krause Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 22:20:43 +0000 To: kdevelop-devel Subject: Re: branch for kdevelop X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kdevelop-devel&m=99722295632230 Waldo, --- Waldo Bastian wrote: > > Feel free to make a new branch but what about GIDEON then? I did try that but failed due to isufficient write permissions to /home/kde, maybe my cvs settings are wrong. > I thought > GIDEON > was supposed to be part of KDE 3.0? Afaik, this is still the case. Unfortunately, the group of developers has split into two fractions. A few people, including me, have decided to integrate kate as the text editor into the current codebase. Ralf agreed that this could be released as KDevelop-2.2 in time with KDE-2.2.1. > If you are now talking about > KDevelop 2.1 > I'm getting this strong feeling that gideon will never be released > and die an > untimely death. I do not think so. > You might want to reconsider your priorities. No, you dont know what the priorities of the contributing fractions are. For example, my priority, to have a functional IDE, that best suits my needs is currently best accomplished by improving KDevelop-2.0. > And why > can't > you continue to use the KDEVELOP_1_4 branch? Just because of the > name? I agree, we could, Ralf thinks it is very confusing to use KDEVEOP_1_4 for new developers, that's why I asked. The more I think about it, the more I agree with you to leave the name as it is. Thanks for your input, Roland > > Cheers, > Waldo > -- > KDE 2.2: We deliver. ===== -- Roland Krause In the garage of life there are mechanics and there are drivers. Mechanics wanted! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ - to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request@kdevelop.org with the following body: unsubscribe »your-email-address«