[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kdevelop-devel
Subject: Re: more ui polishing: working sets
From: Milian Wolff <mail () milianw ! de>
Date: 2010-01-21 2:02:34
Message-ID: 201001210302.37651.mail () milianw ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
On Saturday 16 January 2010 20:26:25 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Sam S., 16.01.2010:
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Nolden <zwabel@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> > > I didn't see the actual message, and cannot find it on the mailing
> > > list. When did you send it, and can you send it again?
> >
> > Hi David, thanks for your reply.
> >
> > I sent the mail on January 8, you can see it at
> > http://lists.kde.org/?t=126295898400003&r=1&w=2 ...
> > I guess there might still be a problem with the mailing list (or it's
> > spam filter) then?
> >
> > > Basically, I do think working sets could be improved further, but I
> > > also feel they work quite well the way they are now, and we have more
> > > serious UI issues in the much more important "building" area that
> > > should IMO be adressed with a higher priority (the connection between
> > > the "Project" menu, "Buildsets", and the project tree view).
> >
> > Yes, I certainly don't want to keep you from those areas... (The
> > reason I didn't work on a proposal for the project handling stuff
> > instead, is that I don't quite understand that myself... So I'll
> > personally definitely be happy to see some UI improvements there...
> > ;-))
> > I was just hoping that in addition to that, the working sets UI
> > cleanups I suggested (or at least a subset thereof) might *also* make
> > it into the 4.0 release...
>
> I will see if I can work on it. Since I got exams coming up a bit of GUI
> work without much side effects is certainly something I could fit in imo.
> But lets see when and how I can port your awesome mockups into reality.
I started to implement one thing or another. Please review, I don't do much
with the GUI-related API of Qt ;-)
Todo/questions:
- how can I make a QToolButton "flat"? sadly there is no setFlat() method :(
And m_setButton->setAutoRaise(true); still has a background that I cannot
remove, even with setting a NoRole as backgroundRole...
- are the icons for load/close working set OK or should we request new ones? I
abused the project icons
- can we decrease the font size here?
- how could I increase the visual separation between title (so far only
"Working Set" but I plan to make that optionally editable inline)?
good n8
--
Milian Wolff
mail@milianw.de
http://milianw.de
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
--
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic