From kdevelop-devel  Sat Jan 16 19:26:25 2010
From: Milian Wolff <mail () milianw ! de>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:26:25 +0000
To: kdevelop-devel
Subject: Re: more ui polishing: working sets
Message-Id: <201001162026.28112.mail () milianw ! de>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kdevelop-devel&m=126367011818585
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0118478602=="

--===============0118478602==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart4065888.TiHzhLWth7";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart4065888.TiHzhLWth7
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sam S., 16.01.2010:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Nolden <zwabel@googlemail.com> wro=
te:
> > I didn't see the actual message, and cannot find it on the mailing list.
> > When did you send it, and can you send it again?
>=20
> Hi David, thanks for your reply.
>=20
> I sent the mail on January 8, you can see it at
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=3D126295898400003&r=3D1&w=3D2 ...
> I guess there might still be a problem with the mailing list (or it's
> spam filter) then?
>=20
> > Basically, I do think working sets could be improved further, but I also
> > feel they work quite well the way they are now, and we have more serious
> > UI issues in the much more important "building" area that should IMO be
> > adressed with a higher priority (the connection between the "Project"
> > menu, "Buildsets", and the project tree view).
>=20
> Yes, I certainly don't want to keep you from those areas... (The
> reason I didn't work on a proposal for the project handling stuff
> instead, is that I don't quite understand that myself... So I'll
> personally definitely be happy to see some UI improvements there...
> ;-))
> I was just hoping that in addition to that, the working sets UI
> cleanups I suggested (or at least a subset thereof) might *also* make
> it into the 4.0 release...

I will see if I can work on it. Since I got exams coming up a bit of GUI wo=
rk=20
without much side effects is certainly something I could fit in imo. But le=
ts=20
see when and how I can port your awesome mockups into reality.
=2D-=20
Milian Wolff
mail@milianw.de
http://milianw.de

--nextPart4065888.TiHzhLWth7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAktSEuEACgkQDA6yEs0dE5MDQACgnkUkR0B343yvDGZR9RSDd6rZ
PaQAnR6D0stSiTz/vK0auSKjoXeQZs4g
=SUKe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4065888.TiHzhLWth7--


--===============0118478602==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

--===============0118478602==--