[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE/kdevplatform/sublime
From:       Andreas Pakulat <apaku () gmx ! de>
Date:       2009-07-21 5:24:49
Message-ID: 20090721052449.GE29902 () neo ! apaku ! dnsalias ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 19.07.09 15:57:58, Aleix Pol wrote:
> I don't think it's appropiate to change all the "signals" -> "Q_SIGNALS". I
> understand it's a valid test for krazy, but I don't think it adds any value
> to KDevelop.

It does, because it makes sure that the kdevplatform module can be used
with any other library. In particular with boost. "signals" is a macro that
can far more easily override some other libraries function etc., while
Q_SIGNALS is very unique to Qt.
 
> (same with the class -> module/class and so on).

That one I totally agree with.

Andreas

-- 
Don't look now, but the man in the moon is laughing at you.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]