[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: allow to embed any kpart?
From:       Aleix <aleixpol () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-11-01 21:02:02
Message-ID: 757d9a550811011402g4d569836x679f63ac43d1824a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Is it possible to have the kompare kpart? Now? why aren't we using it for
vcs support?

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:45 PM, David Nolden <zwabel@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am Samstag, 1. November 2008 17:38:05 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently, even though the classes suggest otherwise, KDevelop4 doesn't
> > really allow to embed other kparts besides Kate. IIRC especially opening
> > images and html files is a problem right now.
> >
> > So I was wondering wether we do want to provide a shell of any arbitrary
> > kpart, or wether we want to limit the embedding to a few well-known parts
> > (like kate, khtml, possibly something to view, but not edit, images)?
> >
> > Andreas
>
> I cannot see any good reason to limit the allowed kparts. Who knows what
> other
> useful kparts someone might come up with at some point.
>
I agree here.

>
> Greetings, David
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

Is it possible to have the kompare kpart? Now? why aren&#39;t we using it for vcs \
support?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:45 PM, David Nolden \
<span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:zwabel@googlemail.com">zwabel@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> \
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); \
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Am Samstag, 1. November 2008 17:38:05 \
schrieb Andreas Pakulat:<br> <div class="Ih2E3d">&gt; Hi,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; currently, even though the classes suggest otherwise, KDevelop4 doesn&#39;t<br>
&gt; really allow to embed other kparts besides Kate. IIRC especially opening<br>
&gt; images and html files is a problem right now.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; So I was wondering wether we do want to provide a shell of any arbitrary<br>
&gt; kpart, or wether we want to limit the embedding to a few well-known parts<br>
&gt; (like kate, khtml, possibly something to view, but not edit, images)?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Andreas<br>
<br>
</div>I cannot see any good reason to limit the allowed kparts. Who knows what \
other<br> useful kparts someone might come up with at some point.<br>
</blockquote><div>I agree here. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; \
padding-left: 1ex;"><br> Greetings, David<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
KDevelop-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org">KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org</a><br>
<a href="https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel" \
target="_blank">https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel</a><br>
 </div></div></blockquote></div><br>



_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]