[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kdevelop-devel
Subject: Re: kdevplatform krazy
From: Roberto Raggi <roberto () kdevelop ! org>
Date: 2007-07-19 13:13:18
Message-ID: 014DA6D6-2774-4178-9587-BDD5D419CEE5 () kdevelop ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi!
Il giorno 19/lug/07, alle ore 14:41, Kris Wong ha scritto:
> True, but that sort of thing is generally considered bad practice
> and I
> believe is undefined according to the c++ standard. You are right,
trust me the evaluation of the assignment operator is very well
defined in the standard.
> though, it is generally common practice to return a reference to the
> item.
you should emulate the assignment operator for primitive types (like
char, int,..) by returing a reference. You can use void if you don't
care about the return type (for instance when you want to disable the
assignment operator).
ciao tobe
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic