[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE/kdevelop/lib/plugins/vcs/interfaces
From:       Matt Rogers <mattr () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-05-31 19:32:16
Message-ID: 200705311432.16824.mattr () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 29 May 2007 11:32, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> (I tried to reply to your commit log but don't see the message yet...
> might be moderated or blocked because I sent from a different address.
> So apologies if it shows up later and duplicates this :-).)
>
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 27.05.07 21:04:33, Matt Rogers wrote:
> >> On Sunday 27 May 2007 20:53, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >>> SVN commit 668891 by apaku:
> >>>
> >>> add exec() which runs the job in a synchronous way
> >>
> >> Why? Under what circumstances would we need the synchronous way of doing
> >> things?
> >
> > For simple scripts for example, those don't have signal/slot stuff set
> > up necessarily.
>
> Right. Btw, whatever happened to wait()? Should we have exec(), wait()
> or both? (Note: exec() == start()+wait() if we have wait().)
>
> To answer Matt: scripts generally run sequentially, it is I think much
> easier to write a script that way than to all the time tie the
> finished() signal to starting the next step of the script.

How bout for right now we don't care about scripts and instead focus on 
actually making a usable IDE? If somebody is using the IDE, why would they 
write scripts?
-- 
Matt

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]