[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE/kdevelop/lib/plugins/vcs/interfaces
From:       Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad () users ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2007-05-29 16:32:39
Message-ID: f3hkj8$6m3$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

(I tried to reply to your commit log but don't see the message yet... 
might be moderated or blocked because I sent from a different address. 
So apologies if it shows up later and duplicates this :-).)

Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 27.05.07 21:04:33, Matt Rogers wrote:
>> On Sunday 27 May 2007 20:53, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>> SVN commit 668891 by apaku:
>>>
>>> add exec() which runs the job in a synchronous way
>>>
>> Why? Under what circumstances would we need the synchronous way of doing 
>> things?
> 
> For simple scripts for example, those don't have signal/slot stuff set
> up necessarily.

Right. Btw, whatever happened to wait()? Should we have exec(), wait() 
or both? (Note: exec() == start()+wait() if we have wait().)

To answer Matt: scripts generally run sequentially, it is I think much 
easier to write a script that way than to all the time tie the 
finished() signal to starting the next step of the script.

-- 
Matthew
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in."
   --Kim Alm, A.S.R.


_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]