[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: Configuration options for QMake project
From:       Ian Reinhart Geiser <geiseri () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2006-07-30 14:19:39
Message-ID: 200607301019.40100.geiseri () yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:46, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 29.07.06 08:14:55, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Friday 28 July 2006 18:39, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > before making to many changes on my own, I'd like to know about a
> > > couple of things:
> > >
> > > 1. The current configuration dialog supports the setting of "console"
> > > for the CONFIG variable, however this has only an effect on win32 so I
> > > think this should be removed
> >
> > Remember that Qt is cross platform. You can develop on Linux for windows.
> > We'll need to keep this option IMHO.
>
> Ok, that does make sense. What about the windows option? Should I add
> it?
>
> > > 2. The "Build as DLL" and the "Shared" option are duplicates, i.e. If
> > > choosing "shared library" this adds the "dll" keyword to CONFIG, and
> > > "Build as DLL" does the same, so I think the "Build as DLL" option
> > > should be removed.
> >
> > I think it should be renamed to 'Build as Shared Library'.
>
> Huh? Why do you want to keep the duplicate option? As I said, they both
> activate the same option for the CONFIG variable, so I don't really see
> a reason for keeping both.
Remember that you can use mingw32 to build Windows applications from KDevelop.  
Even then at least at my company we do our development on Linux and 
Integration on OSX, Win32. 

Cheers
	-ian reinhart geiser

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]