Hi Op do, 20-04-2006 te 17:32 +1000, schreef Hamish Rodda: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 03:11, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 10:55, Hamish Rodda wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 06:37, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > ... > > > It's more work to integrate something foreign than to continue with what we > have (imho). One more proposal for a lesser known parser, but one that is striving (and nearly there) for ANSI C++ compatibility : PUMA. It is the basis for AspectC++ and can be downloaded together with AspectC++ on www.aspectc.org . Documentation can be found by googling specifically for PUMA. Now for my proposal for KDevelop (be it SoC or not - IMO i think it might be too easy for SoC) : SCons integration for KDevelop! Greets, Hans (a daily kdevelop user at work, allbeit with a custom written makefile-manager that handles an ARM- and X86-Makefile synchronously -> hence the interest for SCons [crosscompilation] ;-) ) _______________________________________________ KDevelop-devel mailing list KDevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel