I haven't heard any problems with my revised patch... should I assume that it 
is ok to commit?

On Monday 14 March 2005 6:54 pm, Adam Treat wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 5:26 pm, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > On Monday 14 March 2005 23:18, Adam Treat wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've written a very basic patch for katecodecompletion.cpp that allows
> > > me to insert richtext into a KTextEditor::CompletionEntry and for Kate
> > > to display it as richtext inside the completion box.  The behavior of
> > > the part otherwise does not change and it requires absolutely no
> > > changes to the KTE interface.
> >
> > just for notes, like said in irc, as this will break compatibility with
> > all other apps using this interface, as <> aren'T longer usable, don't
> > think this is way to go
>
> I've modified the patch to check for <qt></qt> (which is called for by Qt's
> richtext anway...) around entry.text, entry.prefix and entry.postfix ... if
> it does not find them then it will treat the text as regular so other apps
> will not be affected.  The only way they'll break is if they are actually
> completing for <qt></qt>.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Adam

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel