[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: cpp header organizer
From:       Ian Reinhart Geiser <ian () geiseri ! com>
Date:       2005-01-29 21:44:54
Message-ID: 200501291644.58618.ian () geiseri ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 29 January 2005 12:13, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> Well ... I don't want to start a troll; but can somebody explain to me why
> KDevelop has to follow the KDE release cycle. It's a very big project
> which IMO could (and maybe should) have a life of its own.
Because there is this unfounded belief that if we shoehorn our release cycle 
into the kde release cycle we can get more "press".  When in fact it allows 
us to release a haphazard pile of code we have to fix before the .1 
release :P

This is my opinion as some one who has been fighting this for some years and 
loosing, so feel free to ignore me ;)

Cheers
	-ian reinhart geiser

-- 
------(Ian Reinhart Geiser)-----<geiseri@yahoo.com>-----
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?
How I wish, how I wish you were here.
-Pink Floyd, Wish You Where Here

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]