[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: KDevelop 3.1 - Release or postpone?
From:       Alexander Dymo <adymo () mksat ! net>
Date:       2004-07-22 16:32:53
Message-ID: 200407221932.53682.adymo () mksat ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 22 July 2004 01:36, Jonas Jacobi wrote:
> Holding release dates is, of course,
> important, but my experience is, that a "poor" release lowers the
> perception of an application for a long time, even if their is a good/fixed
> release, shortly afterwards. 
I can't agree that 3.1 in it's current state is a poor release. It's in any
case better than 3.0.x. And if it is better we should release it.

> And we are not talking about such a long 
> period of delay.
And I'm suggesting a quick 3.2 release withing merely the same timeline.

-- 
Alexander Dymo
ICST Department, National University of Shipbuilding, Mykolayiv, Ukraine

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]