[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-devel
Subject:    Re: kdelibs/kmdi<-->kdevelop/lib/qextmdi
From:       Alexander Dymo <cloudtemple () mksat ! net>
Date:       2004-01-23 17:52:06
Message-ID: 200401231952.06179.cloudtemple () mksat ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 23 January 2004 19:21, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> I understand the arguments here, but can't we at least keep support for
> KDE 3.1 in KDevelop 3.1 ?
Do we really want to do this? IMHO it doesn't worth doing so. Yes we can,
like we are doing now for KDE 3.0. But look at 3.0 compat - it's a pain
to keep comatibility and the result is no better - KDevelop 3.0 in a KDE 3.0
system is unstable like a hell.

PS: Ok, complex question, I propose woting at kdedevelopers.org site.

-- 
Alexander Dymo
Ukrainian State Maritime Technical University, ICST Department


_______________________________________________
Kdevelop-devel mailing list
Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]