[falk.brettschneider@gmx.de reply]:
> Hi (Simon)!
>
> Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> >You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> >
> >http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49205
> >hausmann@kde.org changed:
> >
> >           What    |Removed                     |Added
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-- CC|                            |hausmann@kde.org Status|UNCONFIRMED    
> >             |RESOLVED
> >         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
> >
> >
> >
> >------- Additional Comments From hausmann@kde.org  2002-10-15 23:33
> > ------- You might probably want to report this to feedback@suse.de or
> > bugzilla.suse.de (if you're a SuSE beta tester and know the password) .
> > There's nothing we can do about this, as it is SuSE that maintains the
> > spec file / does the packaging (in your case) .
>
> But how should they ever know what is a useful split? I suppose they
> aren't KDevelopers enough to judge a split is useful and furthermore all
> the useful combinations of the plugins. IMO the KDevelop team must
> define that somehow. Then isn't it good to maintain the spec file by
> ourselves?
> I think the wishlist entry should be reopened...
>
> Ciao
> F@lk
How about kdevelop-core and kdevelop-plugin, where we can split the plugins 
into required plugins and optional one ...
MAthieu
-- 
A [golf] ball hitting a tree shall be deemed not to have hit the tree.
Hitting a tree is simply bad luck and has no place in a scientific game.
The player should estimate the distance the ball would have traveled if it
had not hit the tree and play the ball from there, preferably atop a nice
firm tuft of grass.
		-- Donald A. Metz


_______________________________________________
Kdevelop-devel mailing list
Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel