[Matthias Hoelzer-Kluepfel reply]:
> On Monday 05 August 2002 19:22, Roland Krause wrote:
> > Matthias,
> >
> > --- Matthias Hoelzer-Kluepfel <Matthias@Hoelzer-Kluepfel.de> wrote:
> > > a) Remove the kdevelop sources from HEAD, as Roland has suggested.
> > > (It has
> > > been friday, but the code is still in, so we should do this now ;)
> >
> > Yes, I will do it today. I have been busy with family matters and this
> > week I am trying to help preparing for LWCE.
>
> Don't worry, I did it this morning ;)
>
> > I still think it would be best to release anything. Things that turn
> > out to be completely unmaintained for a long period of time should be
> > removed.
>
> Ok, Bernd and you have convinced me. I think we should re-interpret the
> meaning of the groups in the list:
>
> a) Essential parts
> b) Parts that really should be there
> c) Parts that will be there when no showstoppers are found
>
> This would mean that there would not be a 1.0 release without a working C++
> support part, but if any serious issues arise with, e.g., the python
> support, we could think about dropping it.
>
> And in the beta, we will just leave out the obsolete parts plus distpart.
>
>
> Does this sound reasonable?
>
>
> Bye,
> Matthias.
add QT projects to appwizard.
Mathieu

-- 
I took a course in speed reading and was able to read War and Peace in
twenty minutes.

It's about Russia.
		-- Woody Allen


_______________________________________________
Kdevelop-devel mailing list
Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel