[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kdevelop-devel
Subject: Re: The result of the whole discussion about Gideon and 2.2 (was: Re: A common roadmap)
From: Christian Couder <christian () kdevelop ! org>
Date: 2002-03-31 11:17:34
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
Richard Dale wrote:
>
> I don't think reorganising the CVS like this is a good idea, either with
> adding new branches or moving things around, or both. We might lose the cvs
> history and that will make it harder to maintain both gideon and KDevelop.
I am not a CVS expert but I heard that there are hacks to do it properly and
not lose anything.
> I would prefer to either leave things as they are, or better give gideon a
> new name (probably with a K in it) and move it to kdesdk.
Anyway this would mean to lose gideon's CVS history if we are not able to
hack cvs files properly.
> If there is a
> need for a common development kparts directory, that could go into kdesdk
> too, and still be used by KDevelop.
Then why not move KDevelop to kdesdk too ?
Bye,
Christian.
_______________________________________________
Kdevelop-devel mailing list
Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic