From kdevelop-devel Wed Mar 27 03:42:42 2002 From: John Firebaugh Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 03:42:42 +0000 To: kdevelop-devel Subject: Re: The day of seperation is here X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kdevelop-devel&m=101720079401125 On Tuesday 26 March 2002 4:26, Harald Fernengel wrote: > Hi, > > > A fork can no longer be prevented. > > Sorry, forking is not an option. I agree. I think almost everyone agrees on the basic things: 1) We want to use the KTextEditor interfaces. 2) We want the modular design of gideon parts. 3) We want the UI framework provided by QextMdi (with possible enhancement of split-pane view). It seems we have two basic options: 1) Continue development of the KDEVELOP_2_BRANCH. The largest change is reworking of core so that it can load parts. Roland and Roberto are working hard and fast in this directions. Potential problem: code code in KDEVELOP_2_BRANCH is in not so great shape. CKDevelop is a huge class that desparately needs refactoring. 2) Continue development of gideon. The largest change is integrating QextMDI and porting core and parts to KTextEditorInterfaces. Harry and Matthias are working in this direction. > Whether we choose KDevelop2 or Gideon as main IDE is not that important, I > don't care about different branches or maybe even move Gideon core away, > but the modular design has to survive. Yes. _______________________________________________ Kdevelop-devel mailing list Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel