From kdevelop-devel Wed Mar 27 00:26:35 2002 From: Harald Fernengel Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:26:35 +0000 To: kdevelop-devel Subject: Re: The day of seperation is here X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kdevelop-devel&m=101718911123682 Hi, > A fork can no longer be prevented. Sorry, forking is not an option. Forking will split up the development team even more (and there are few e= nough=20 anyways). It will lead to more code duplication and finally we'll have tw= o=20 half-finished versions. Not to mention web-sites and all the other stuff. We did a major step forward by integrating Gideon parts into KDevelop2 an= d=20 this was a step in the right direction. Now that we can use Gideon parts in KDevelop2 I suggest calling them "KDe= velop=20 parts" since this is what they are. PARTS of KDevelop. Code for an IDE th= at=20 kicks ass. Code that belongs into the MAIN branch. Whether we choose KDevelop2 or Gideon as main IDE is not that important, = I=20 don't care about different branches or maybe even move Gideon core away, = but=20 the modular design has to survive. I suggest that we stick to the release plan made by Falk: - try to get KDE_2_2_BRANCH as stable as possible=20 - hack support for KDevelop parts into KDEVELOP_2_BRANCH. After that we can decide again what will be the new "official" KDevelop c= ore. Best regards, Harry _______________________________________________ Kdevelop-devel mailing list Kdevelop-devel@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel