[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-bugs
Subject:    [Bug 162375] less agressive switch interface/implementation
From:       Jens Dagerbo <jens.dagerbo () swipnet ! se>
Date:       2008-05-21 18:40:58
Message-ID: 20080521184058.7759.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162375         




------- Additional Comments From jens.dagerbo swipnet se  2008-05-21 20:40 -------
No, it wouldn't be cool, it would be inconsistent:

If you ask the IDE to take you to the implementation, it should put you in a \
predictable place (the first line), not put you (for example) 400 lines into the \
function just because that's where you happened to be last time you visited it 8 days \
earlier. (Extreme example, but I hope it puts the point across.) This would be \
completely unexpected and seem like a bug to the user.

If you want to go back to where you were, use 'back'. Adding code to introduce \
unpredictable and inconsistent behaviour is a bad idea, IMHO. This is a WONTFIX in my \
mind.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-bugs mailing list
KDevelop-bugs@kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-bugs


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]