From kdevelop-bugs Mon Jan 29 19:32:29 2007 From: kbugger Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:32:29 +0000 To: kdevelop-bugs Subject: [Bug 140594] kdevelop fails to evaluate local variables Message-Id: <20070129193229.16530.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kdevelop-bugs&m=118306963712080 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140594 kbugger piments com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fails to correctly evaluate |kdevelop fails to evaluate |local variables |local variables ------- Additional Comments From kbugger piments com 2007-01-29 20:32 ------- Ah! I have realised since posting what is happening. My bad, I added it as an eval not a watch. Maybe the header "Recent" could be made more explicit, recent what? In the context of dynamically updated locals and watches nothing suggests that these are either fixed and no longer relate the varialbes they include. Perhaps "static evaluations" would be a clearer indication of what is shown. since I've got a line open could I suggest two other enhancements here? Context menu for a watch could include "modify watch" where the text would be copied to text entry for modification. (especially useful since the watch can not be selected as text for copy, only highlighted). similarly the expressions listed could have an context entry "refresh" that would cause them to be re-evaluated. Both pretty trivial to code and nice added functionality. regards.