[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-bugs
Subject:    [Bug 63883] breakpoint do not work if there are 2 files with the same name
From:       kdevelop-bugs-admin () barney ! cs ! uni-potsdam ! de
Date:       2005-02-16 10:50:54
Message-ID: 20050216105054.11892.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63883         




------- Additional Comments From shift newmail ru  2005-02-16 11:50 -------
I cheked it in KDevelop 3.2 beta 2
which comes with SuSE 9.1 packages of KDE 3.2beta2 
and the bug is still there


On Tuesday 08 February 2005 16:52, shift newmail ru wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63883
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From shift newmail ru  2005-02-08 14:52
> ------- I still can reproduce it on kDevelop 3.1.2 in SuSE 9.1
>
> make a project with 2 subdirs something like this:
>
>
> /dir1
>          test.cpp
> /dir2
>          test.cpp
> /src
>          main.cpp
>
> all files linked into a single executable.
>
> make a content something like this:
>
>
> dir1/test.cpp :
>        #include <stdio.h>
>         int Test1(){
>             return printf("TEST1 called\n");
>        }
> dir2/test.cpp :
>        #include <stdio.h>
>         int Test2(){
>             return printf("TEST2 called\n");
>        }
>
>
> make sure that  linenumber of return satement is the same in both files
> !!!
>
>
> src/main.cpp :
>         #include <stdio.h>
>         int Test1();
>         int Test2();
>         int main() {
>                  printf("calling test1:...");
>                  Test1();
>                  printf("calling test2:...");
>                  Test2();
>                  return 0;
>         }
>
>
> now compile and run it.
> then set the breakpoint upon the return statement in dir1/test.cpp
> run and see the results.
> now set the breakpoint upon the return statement in dir2/test.cpp
> run and compare.
>
> in my case the result was the same: in both cases it stopped in the
> dir1/test.cpp. In DDD it works just as it should.
>
> sorry guys, i dont have possibility to test it in HEAD right now.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]