[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop-bugs
Subject:    [Bug 91757] Doesn't respect TerminalApplication setting
From:       kdevelop-bugs-admin () barney ! cs ! uni-potsdam ! de
Date:       2004-10-26 7:16:23
Message-ID: 20041026071623.20115.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
        
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91757        




------- Additional Comments From jens.dagerbo swipnet se  2004-10-26 09:16 -------
It would be _really_ nice if when someone restates a bugreport they at least leave a \
comment about it. Preferably even why they did so. 

There is no way through the web interface to tell that the "Summary" of this bug has \
in fact changed (or who did it). 

While the current "Doesn't respect TerminalApplication setting" might actually be \
considered a bug (if "welformed" KDE applications need to support this setting) and \
the original more a wish ("make KDevelop not require konsole" - I don't remember the \
wording), this restated summary in fact changes the report in such a way that if we \
fix the bug, this doesn't fullfill the wish.

The TerminalApplication setting is controlled via KControl, which is part of kdebase, \
which is what the original report explicitly said shouldn't be required.

Of course, to have a sole (to my knowledge) hardcoded dependency on kdebase could \
well be considered a bug.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]