[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdevelop
Subject:    Re: Reinstantiation of the KDK
From:       Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf () dingo ! ping ! net ! au>
Date:       2001-03-13 1:14:18
[Download RAW message or body]

Steven Suson wrote
> Greetings all,
> 
>     Having done a bit of driving this last weekend, and while doing so,
> some software design, etc., I was thinking about the many emails on this
> list having to do with installation issues, compatibility issues with
> various packages used by kdevelop, and things along these same lines. It
> seemed to me that many of these were addressed previously with the KDK.
> 
>     So, I just wanted to throw this out to the list, to see what
> everyone else thought. In terms of getting the great kdevelop IDE into
> not only more hands, but also into more widely varied hands, would
> reinstantiation of the KDK (say, a 1.3 and 1.4 version for KDE1 and
> KDE2, respectively) give us more bang for our buck? I'm very interested
> in what everyone thinks.

The KDK package was a great way of getting a complete IDE without
worrying about the details of its installation, especially for
newbies. I'm in support for a call to re-instantiate the KDK package
and willing to help.

cheerio Berndt
-- 
Name    : Berndt Josef Wulf            | +++ With BSD on Packet Radio +++
E-Mail  : wulf@ping.net.au             |    tfkiss, tnt, dpbox, wampes
ICQ     : 18196098                     |  VK5ABN, Nairne, South Australia 
URL     : http://www.ping.net.au/~wulf | MBOX : vk5abn@vk5abn.#lmr.#sa.au.oc
Sysinfo : DEC AXPpci33+, NetBSD-1.5    | BBS  : vk5abn.#lmr.#sa.aus.oc 

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request@kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]