[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kdepim-users
Subject: Re: [KDE-pim] New Install: AKONADI wit PostgreSQL
From: "Hessler, Klaus-Michael" <mailinglisten () kmHessler ! de>
Date: 2020-12-23 18:54:23
Message-ID: 22da96b1-5926-3a50-2d49-2d4153944560 () kmHessler ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Thanks a lot, Ingo!
> It's great that many people in this thread try to help, but I have the
> impression that Martin (and me) are the only people who have really
> understood what you, Michael, want to do. I'm not sure whether it's a
> good idea to use the system PostgreSQL server instead of a standalone one.
> What do you hope to gain by this?
OK, may be my poor understanding: I use PostgreSQL very much with
different databases, so "my PostgreSQL-server" is running almost
full-time. In the past I understood from this list, that usage of
PostgreSQL for Akonadi is the better choice. So _my approach_ was to
have one server only, for "my usage" and for Akonadi.
Actually (on older hardware) my PostgreSQL-installation has two databases:
* postgres (the standard one) with scheme public,
* myDB with several (personal) schemes and public.
My approach for the new setup: Transfer both and add a new one
"Akonadi". The reasons for _my understanding_: Less processes running,
less installation, less update, configuration easier to understand. But:
If it's preferable have two servers and you recommend this, it can be
done but I have to understand the install (how to get the PackageManager
to install the installed package PostgreSQL again?) and update-processes
for both.
Which solution is your recommendation:
A: One PostgreSQL-installation, three databases: postgres, myDB, Akonadi.
B: One PostgreSQL-installation, two databases: postgres, myDB; let
Akonadi use postgres.
C: Two PostgreSQL-installations:
C1: Two databases: postgres, myDB;
C2: postgres OR Akonadi for Akonadi
Let's decide this question first!
I've seen, that you already answered my To-Do-list (your mail 18:09 h);
may be, we can update this after the decision?
Thank you and regards, Michael
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Thanks a lot, Ingo</tt><tt>!<br>
</tt></div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1854386.PYKUYFuaPT@collossus.localdomain"><tt>It's great
that many people in this thread try to help, but I have the
impression that Martin (and me) are the only people who have
really understood what you, Michael, want to do.
I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to use the system
PostgreSQL server instead of a standalone one.<br>
What do you hope to gain by this?</tt><tt><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt>OK, may be my poor understanding: I use PostgreSQL very much
with different databases, so "my PostgreSQL-server" is running
almost full-time. In the past I understood from this list, that
usage of PostgreSQL for Akonadi is the better choice. So <u>my
approach</u> was to have one server only, for "my usage" and for
Akonadi. <br>
<br>
Actually (on older hardware) my PostgreSQL-installation has two
databases: <br>
</tt>
<ul>
<li><tt>postgres (the standard one) with scheme public,<br>
</tt></li>
<li><tt>myDB with several (personal) schemes and public.</tt></li>
</ul>
<tt>My approach for the new setup: Transfer both and add a new one
"Akonadi". The reasons for <u>my understanding</u>: Less
processes running, less installation, less update, configuration
easier to understand. But: If it's preferable have two servers and
you recommend this, it can be done but I have to understand the
install (how to get the PackageManager to install the installed
package PostgreSQL again?) and update-processes for both.<br>
<br>
Which solution is your recommendation:<br>
A: One PostgreSQL-installation, three databases: </tt><tt><tt>postgres,
</tt>myDB, Akonadi.<br>
B: </tt><tt><tt>One PostgreSQL-installation, two databases:
postgres, myDB; let Akonadi use postgres.<br>
C: Two </tt></tt><tt><tt><tt><tt>PostgreSQL-installation</tt></tt></tt></tt><tt>s:<br>
C1: T</tt><tt><tt><tt>wo databases: postgres, myDB; <br>
C2: postgres OR Akonadi for Akonadi <br>
</tt></tt></tt><tt><br>
Let's decide this question first! </tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>I've seen, that you already answered my To-Do-list (your
mail 18:09 h); may be, we can update this after the decision?</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Thank you and regards, Michael</tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
</body>
</html>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic