[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] rant
From:       Martin Steigerwald <martin () lichtvoll ! de>
Date:       2015-01-28 14:49:15
Message-ID: 2070181.psXxBPbfTQ () merkaba
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, 14:44:41 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:12:20 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > I do not think that any "but the concept is all bad" is
> > going to help.
> > =

> > I think the main idea behind it is sound.
> =

> If I would've only said 'Akonadi sucks' or sth like that it would be a
> rather pointless post and I wouldn't have posted it.
> =

> But as opposed to you, I now have my doubts whether the *idea* behind it
> is actually sound and Akonadi is actually used in the way it was
> envisioned back then. And therefor I responed in a '+1' type of way to
> that part of Ren=E9's post in the hope to give some input to the
> developers for the Akonadi Next design. And given that many
> applications are now transitioning toward the (far) more granular and
> modular Frameworks 5, now seems a good time to voice my opinion on
> this.

I think we are quite near to one another.

Actually I also think that redoing Akonadi from scratch with the lessons =

learned is a good idea. Fixing it all in place may just be more difficult =

than restarting from a clean base.

I just thought you were against some kind of Akonadi framework for =

handling stuff in the background in general, but it seems you were not.

As for feedback to developers: I am not sure whether many of them read all =

the mails here.

Ciao,
-- =

Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]