--===============0371790999== Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1813866.JBnbXH4x9U; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit --nextPart1813866.JBnbXH4x9U Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 09 August 2010, Richard Creighton wrote: > On Sunday 08 August 2010 18:29:49 you wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 8. August 2010 >=20 > 19:56:30 schrieb Richard Creighton: > > > I normally have the 'inbox' set to >=20 > text only. Certain trusted >=20 > > > correspondants have a filter set to move >=20 > the message to another folder >=20 > > > which allows the display of HTML. You >=20 > could set up the same type of >=20 > > > defaults for the ability to reply in HTML >=20 > without forcing anyone to >=20 > > > violate their rights/desires to never do so. > >=20 > > Hi Richard, > >=20 > > would you mind sharing how you set up no HTML as >=20 > default, but having it >=20 > > allowed for certain contacts. Is there a good >=20 > tutorial for that online? >=20 > > Sounds interesting to me. > >=20 > > Thanks a lot, > >=20 > >=20 > > Pascal >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Well, what I've done is go into SETTINGS for KMail and > select SECURITY -> Receiving and ensure the checkboxes for PREFER > HTML and the one under it are both OFF. >=20 > Then, save and exit the settings > configuration. Then select a folder and from the menu at the top of > the window, select "Folder". There you can turn on the 'Prefer > HTML' checkbox which will affect only the selected folder. You can > do this for as many folders as you see fit. Remember, the default > is now OFF so any you want ON have to be specified individually by > folder. This is only for automatic DISPLAY of HTML but it does > enable you to avoid all the "warnings" regarding HTML display. It > doesn't solve the issue of replying in HTML, but under settings for > KMail, there is a provision for external editor. This "sorta" > works but it is selected all the time, even if you don't want HTML > or other special editing capabilities. Thus, it is not a good > substitute for an integrated HTML editor that is controllable by > KMail settings. >=20 > I am not > aware of any good tutorials on this. The *manual* for KMail kinda > glosses over this subject...probably for the same reason as the > inability to reply in HTML if you choose to do so for whatever > reason...eg, the dev has no real interest in interfacing to external > editors, which is their prerogative but it is my opinion that just > like going to the bathroom....the jobs not done till the paperwork > is done. Paperwork in the programming world includes documentation > IMO. Not as fun as coding perhaps, but at least as important. True. But who says that the developers have to write the documentation.=20 Non-developers cannot contribute code to KMail, but most of them should=20 be able to contribute documentation. I should also point out that=20 developers are largely unable to write user-readable documentation=20 because they often use too much technical jargon. If you are interested then have a look at http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Documentation/KDE4/kdepim/kmail Regards, Ingo --nextPart1813866.JBnbXH4x9U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxgSrMACgkQGnR+RTDgudhh+gCgwLI+A2XfVq3MQKdtvBcBObKL BI4An3ZW0J2WxmZXJgzi9FxiTSbedkTG =F41t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1813866.JBnbXH4x9U-- --===============0371790999== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list kdepim-users@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users --===============0371790999==--