[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users]
From:       Darknight <darknight7 () tiscali ! it>
Date:       2010-03-04 8:39:49
Message-ID: 201003040939.50056.darknight7 () tiscali ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

2010-03-03 21:45:00 Ingo Klöcker
> You might want to disable the Strigi Desktop File Indexer. It is not
> needed for KMail (or any of the other KDE PIM apps). I think the file
> indexer is mostly responsible for the size of Nepomuk's database.

I double checked but it was already disabled as I don't use it. However 
disabling "nepomuk semantic desktop" in the same dialog, killing processes and 
restarting kmail apparently did the trick.
I had not tried because I thought it would prevent akonadi from starting but 
obviously this was not the case. I feel a bit confused about what is really 
needed to run kmail now and what will be in the future. I don't think I want 
nepomuk around if I get the kind of hit I experienced but I've read at least a 
blog entry that says nepomuk will be one of the premiums of the new kmail. (?)

Thanks for your suggestions
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]