[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] Pop Server issues
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-03-06 22:07:21
Message-ID: 200703062307.24152 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 06 March 2007 03:24, Joao-Philippe wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 09:05, Joao-Philippe wrote:
> > Hi List
> >
> > I switched from SuSE93 to openSUSE102 this weekend, so with the
> > corresponding upgrades to kde/kontact/kmail
> > KDE 355 r45.2
> > Kontact 123
> > Kmail 195
> >
> > when I try to send a message with my work address, it returns this:
> >
> > Sending failed:
> > Message sending failed since the following recipients were rejected
> > by the server:
> > joaophilippe.mb.monteiro@gmail.com (The server responded: "sorry,
> > that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.5.3 -
> > chkuser)") The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you
> > either fix the problem (e.g. a broken address) or remove the
> > message from the 'outbox' folder. The following transport protocol
> > was used:
> > jean-philippe _[a]_ phareps.org
> >
> > I know it doesn't look like a kmail issue, but that wasn't
> > happening on 9.3 - kmail 1.8... Server doesn' t require
> > authentication or encryption. I've been using these servers for
> > years. up til Friday...
> >
> >  Thanks.
>
> Issue "kinda" sorted, thanks to Blade (& Anne of which I used the
> private address to check my outgoing abilities & proper displaying of
> address over a non gmail account)
>
> Thanks to both of you, I now run it all over gmail, my data can be
> spied :( I can send 10megs attachments :) & google forbiding pro use
> of its services I could loose it all in the blink of an eye :( ... :(
> again.
>
> KMail _does_ have a problem with the server at phpnet.org, which I
> know is OK with outlook, outlook express, web interface, KMail1.8 &
> Thunderbird: Proven-foolproofed, all-in-all I have that much of
> colleagues that use that much of softwares here. I checked with my
> ISP smtp: everyday.com.kh is ok, so only phpnet.org, or my
> phareps.org thing has an issue with this install.

Do you use an encrypted connection? If not, then you could log the 
communication between KMail and the SMTP server (e.g. with ethereal) 
and see what the difference between KMail 1.8 and KMail 1.9 is.

> Now, given the fact it was not an issue over SuSE93/KMail1.8, it is
> still a kmail1.9 issue: not every transport gets acknowledged by
> KMail.

What do you mean by this?

> What has changed between 1.8 & 1.9 to generate this? 

I'm sorry, but I don't know.

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]