[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] Korganizer appointment size
From:       Shawn Perry <redmopml () comcast ! net>
Date:       2006-07-25 18:24:30
Message-ID: 200607251224.30545.redmopml () comcast ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

I am in the middle of a complete system recompile, and it seems to have fixed 
the problem.  I did make a change to my CFLAGS, from -Os to -O2, and appears 
to have fixed it.  I appreciate all your help.

Thanx,
Shawn

On Sunday 16 July 2006 18:18, Shawn Perry wrote:
> Recompile didn't help.  New calendar file didn't help.  Any other ideas?
>
> Shawn
>
> On Friday 14 July 2006 15:24, Shawn Perry wrote:
> > I've googled and searched and I've not found a thing about this bug.  I'm
> > not using 64-bit, I'm actually running on a p3-500.  I'll try
> > re-compiling it (again) and see if that helps.
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> > On Friday 14 July 2006 14:10, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > On Friday 14 July 2006 21:32, Shawn Perry wrote:
> > > > The problem is that it's covering the wrong area.  If I set an
> > > > apointment to an hour in duration, it should cover an hour's worth of
> > > > time.  In almost all circumstances, it does not.  I'm running Gentoo
> > > > (with pretty tame optimizations settings) and 3.5.2.  I've had this
> > > > problem since 3.4.  I don't need any locking of apointments, or any
> > > > complaints when apointments overlap (though that would be nice too).
> > > >  Also, the appointments cover one another, so if I set one for a
> > > > shorter duration than another and within the same timeframe, I won't
> > > > be able to see the shorter one.
> > >
> > > There seems to be something seriously wrong with your version of
> > > KOrganizer. It should be pretty obvious that such a bug can't exist in
> > > KOrganizer since KDE 3.4 without anyone but you noticing.
> > >
> > > Are you probably using a 64-bit-system? Maybe the code calculating the
> > > dimension of the boxes doesn't work correctly on 64-bit-systems? But
> > > even then we should already have heard of this before.
> > >
> > > Did you check (on bugs.kde.org) whether other people have submitted a
> > > bug report for this?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ingo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > KDE PIM users mailing list
> > kdepim-users@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDE PIM users mailing list
> kdepim-users@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]