[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] How to share Mutt and Kmail folders?
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-05-17 17:43:14
Message-ID: 200605171943.15694 () helena ! mathA ! rwth-aachen ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2006 01:17 schrieb Gurvan Huiban:
> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:17, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > A kind of
> > > intermediate layer between the files and the application? Won't
> > > it slow-down the responsiveness of the applications?
> >
> > Ideally it should speed up the responsiveness because only the data
> > that's necessary will be transfered from the backend to the
> > frontend. Currently, KOrganizer always loads the whole calendar.
> >
> > > Will it work with procmail (or will procmail work with akonadi)?
> >
> > Not sure. A possible solution would be the workaround that we
> > already propose in the KMail FAQ (in the KMail manual).
>
> Actually, I was thinking "will it be possible to use procmail to
> filter-and-deliver emails in the different folders we use with
> kmail", not only in a spool folder. I would personally find it
> useful.

I don't think we'll make sure that this will be possible with Akonadi. 
IOW it will probably not work with procmail out of the box, but maybe 
it will be possible to write a small helper application to make 
procmail able to put messages into different folders in Akonadi.

> > > What about other (non-gnome neither KDE) apps?
> >
> > The Akonadi protocol can be implemented by any application. It's
> > not restricted to Qt or GTK apps.
>
> I referred to gnome and KDE apps because that what appeared in the
> graph on the page you sent. Such graph make think that Gnome will
> also developp an API to use Akonadi. But are there other
> projects/apps that showed support/interest for the API? Or maybe 
> Akonadi is too "young" to have "third party" apps implementing an API
> for it?

Probably, yes.

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]