--===============1170524446== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2031846.7lQTvfUpPm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2031846.7lQTvfUpPm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 23 May 2005 12:28, Martin Fahrendorf wrote: > Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 09:06 schrieb Till Adam: > > On Friday 20 May 2005 08:03, Martin Fahrendorf wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2005 20:47 schrieb Till Adam: > > > > On Monday 16 May 2005 14:03, Sophana Kok wrote: > > > > > I've setup the whole thing, and when I add events or todos, it > > > > > just says 'unable to save event ...'. But I can see in the imap > > > > > folder that the event is there. > > > > > When restarting kontact, the event were effectively not stored. > > > > > > > > Note that starting with KDE 3.4 you have to use an account of > > > > type "disconnected imap" for the groupware functionality to work. > > > > > > Is there soewhere in the net a documentation about the advantage > > > and disatvantage of disconnected imap against normal imap? > > > > Might I humbly refer you to the interview they did with me on the dot > > yesterday? I think there I've explained it reasonably well. Feel free > > to ask if something remains unclear. > > So I understand the difference of disconnected impa and plain imap. But > what is the reason to force the use of disconnected imap for using > groupware functionality? > > As an example: On our company (and at my home server) the fileserver > (where the home dir lives) and the mailserver are identical. So, if I > want to use groupware functionality, kmail have to copy all the mails > (with all those mailing list they get up to about 1 Gig) from the > server to my home dir. The question is why? I see the advantages for > road warriors, but for the others? The reasons are implementational. Online imap is asynchronous, while dimap= =20 allows synchronous access. Asynchronous operations increase the complexity = of=20 the code massively, so I decided to not risk it for now. I tried for the=20 kolab1 resource, and it was quite a nasty hack. Note that you can use either subscription or a separate account and ACLs to= =20 only access your resource folders using dimap, and the rest using online=20 imap. Till --nextPart2031846.7lQTvfUpPm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCmddvtrsWGirveVsRAhqpAKDFeD4/hL/BKVVBtjVTE3FyE+WAawCePeyj 1wkPrcJxP6Xdxy6fdpff9X0= =7gB7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2031846.7lQTvfUpPm-- --===============1170524446== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list kdepim-users@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users --===============1170524446==--