--===============1668232581==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_ClVjAINFVmX2aQw"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--Boundary-02=_ClVjAINFVmX2aQw
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 26 April 2004 10:36, Alexander Poslavsky wrote:
> On Sunday 25 April 2004 18:22, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> > The next version of KMail (version 1.7) will be much faster. I
> > measured a speed up of 1350% with 4300 messages on the server. So
> > in your case the time should go down from 90 seconds to about 7
> > seconds (still a bit slower than Mozilla).
>
> What version did you use to measure, are you talking about the
> current CVS-version? (KMail 1.6.51)

Yes, I'm using the current CVS version. As always, your mileage may=20
vary, i.e. you might get other numbers. But it should still be much=20
faster than with the CVS version from Thursday. Over a slow network the=20
speed up might not be as impressive as in my case.

Anyway, why do you ask?

Regards,
Ingo

--Boundary-02=_ClVjAINFVmX2aQw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAjVlCGnR+RTDgudgRAk8hAJ9AEWGm+0wc7PF/hzySqH0D/u3pegCZASK3
dz6fNsSBzpEu4HL1L3AcswQ=
=HXX6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_ClVjAINFVmX2aQw--

--===============1668232581==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users

--===============1668232581==--