[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-www
Subject:    Re: Inclusion of "Konstruct" in www.kde.org's application news
From:       Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () babylon2k ! de>
Date:       2002-12-21 21:01:05
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 21 December 2002 13:52, Andreas Pour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For what it's worth I support the request, and its actually trivial to
> implement on my end.  It would also be nice to have a policy for this -
> back in the days when the webteam was small it was easy to get exceptions
> (like the one for "distcc", which is not even a Qt app), but now that the
> group is bigger decision-making will really bog down making exceptions.
>
> A good policy IMHO is "let Andreas make a case-by-case determination upon
> request" and if we disagree we will do so politely :-).
As physos + jasone + me are the kde.org maintainer, think our ok would be 
enough for that procedure ;)

- From my side, I have no problems that there could be apps in the feed which 
don't use kde libs or even qt, as long as they are really kde 
related/relevant. What means "kde relevant" is surely a problem, but I would 
have no problems to let you decide that from case to case. (if somebody in of 
us three don't agree with an special app, can be handled in private mail just 
fine I guess)

As you see, you would only need now the agreement of the other 2 maintainers, 
perhaps ask them in private mail again or CC this mail to them (if they have 
too much to do to watch that list)

cu
Christoph

- -- 
Christoph Cullmann
Kate/KDE developer
cullmann@kde.org
http://kate.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+BNaUyPjDGePm9UIRAuYKAJ9j+B73L1aBQ23/gP1dNc/4fL07yACgkfI4
QMV2cG9civc9Vf+DPHHLnS8=
=A/WA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
kde-www mailing list
kde-www@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-www
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]