[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-windows
Subject:    Re: Re-add rkward build to binary factory
From:       Hannah von Reth <vonreth () kde ! org>
Date:       2019-06-18 12:05:18
Message-ID: ea178216-2467-2663-2847-d7370d210a36 () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Ah we are using cmake...

Probably one of the other recent commits fixed it.


On 18/06/2019 13:59, Hannah von Reth wrote:
> Hm, yes qtwebkit is building something here at the moment, which is 
> strange as the builds where disabled on qt's side 
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebkit.git/commit/?id=154b95c308911b04f11a991b5ac792269f89ab7d \
>                 
> ...
> 
> On 18/06/2019 12:18, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:22:39 +0200
> > Hannah von Reth <vonreth@kde.org> wrote:
> > > currently we are unable to build QtWebkit with mingw.
> > > 
> > > It should be possible to fix QtWebkit,
> > > https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/2cfdf054df2c826d7c61237ee5ac2453b0f3964d/mingw-w64-qtwebkit/PKGBUILD \
> > >  
> > > the patches here might help.
> > could you give me some details? After re-enabling the build for MinGW,
> > qtwebkit just compiled out of the box. It took forever, but did not
> > require any patching. Admittedly, I have cheated a tiny bit by building
> > with --buildtype Release, as RelWithDebInfo exceeded my (virtual) disk
> > space.
> > 
> > I'd like to point of the perhaps the entire reason for the continued
> > existence of QtWebKit *is* MinGW, or more precisely the fact that
> > QtWebEngine cannot be built with MinGW, and thus is not available as an
> > alternative.
> > 
> > > The mingw builds where recently removed after several month of
> > > failing.
> > And just now our MacOS build has been removed, as well. I know it has
> > been failing. *Again* without any change on *our* end.
> > 
> > I'm not directing the following sigh at anyone in particular, as I know
> > there isn't the right address for it. It still wants out though:
> > 
> > I'd love to have more time for the project. But I don't. It totally
> > sucks to come back from a hiatus after a few months, only to find out
> > that there's not just a lack of progress, but the project has been
> > broken by external changes, left broken, *and* removed without notice.
> > Instead of going anywhere, I'm spending hours just trying to get back
> > to the baseline. No fun.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]