[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-windows
Subject:    Re: Binary factory for RKWard
From:       Hannah von Reth <vonreth () kde ! org>
Date:       2018-03-26 12:35:24
Message-ID: 6d15ee1d-5da2-5b18-8349-e6b3fc89361b () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


I just added RKWard to https://binary-factory.kde.org/job/DSL%20Job%20See=
d/

The builds will probably fail right now but that's due to a change on
the ci and the incoming change to the blueprint layout.

Cheers,

Hannah
On 26/03/2018 13:10, Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Monday, 26 March 2018 10:59:31 CEST Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
>> Hi Kevin!
> CC'ing Hannah.
>
> I've unfortunately no idea about the state of our MinGW setup on BFKO.
>
> But thanks for looking into Craft-support!
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
>> I've been very distracted of late, and I've only read about that sweet=

>> binary factory of yours, today. I would very much like to use this for=

>> RKWard!
>>
>> For Windows, I believe we are essentially set up to go. I've just take=
n
>> care of fixing up the craft blueprint this weekend, and successfully
>> produced some working installers. So your blog says, after that I shou=
ld
>> simply ping you to get added. Ping!
>>
>> Note that one peculiarity of RKWard is that we can only build on MinGW=

>> due to depending on a MinGW built binary(*). I hope that does not get
>> in the way.
>>
>> For Mac, well, we'd like to have that, too. But I'll have to admit,
>> we're actually still in the middle of figuring out how to actually do
>> that (well, we have produced some functioning manual builds, but no
>> reliable process, and no bundling, yet). So far we've been going the
>> MacPorts route, as that's what we have experience in from KDE4 times.
>> But importantly also because it seemed to avoid problems with plugins
>> and icons. Are those resolved for craft-based builds, today?
>> https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Build_from_source/Mac
>> does not seem to be getting a whole lot of updates...
>>
>> Regards
>> Thomas
>>
>> (*): r-base. And no, building that from source would not help any, as
>> R brings a whole ecosystem of MinGW-built external add-on packages
>



["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]